Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Why Do So Many Indian Farmers Commit Suicide?

The introduction of genetically engineered seeds, and the coercion of Indian farmers to use them, has led to the largest wave of recorded suicides in human history. In India, it's been estimated that a farmer commits suicide every 30 minutes, typically by ingesting pesticide. But why? The short answer is crop failures, which leaves them in financial ruin.
What many fail to realize is that it's the genetically engineered (GE) seeds that fail (especially Bt cotton), and GE seeds must be repurchased every year. You're not allowed to save patented GE seeds, as has been done since the beginnings of agriculture. Bt cotton is much more expensive than traditional cotton seed, requires more water and pesticides, and has failed to produce the increased crop yields promised by Monsanto. A single failed crop combined with lack of financing options can therefore bankrupt a farmer. Others keep going, taking out more and more loans, until they simply cannot ever pay them back.
Michael Specter tries to make light of such statistics stating that the Indian suicide trend is similar to that in France. In my view, we should be horrified to realize that the business of growing food has gotten so financially challenging that even in a country like France a farmer commits suicide every two days12—again due to being financially ruined, just like the farmers in India. Interestingly, poisoning by pesticide has actually become the leading method of suicide around the world, according to the World Health Organization.13 

Loads of tomato sauce and photoshop. Fake beheadings exposed. Nodisinfo.

The entire beheading is staged. Regardless, what does arch-Zionist mole David Cameron think he’s doing? Is it that important to get the UK public opinion in his favor so he can continue to wage war in Iraq? Is the demonization of Islaam and Muslims so crucial for the vile Zionist-controlled governments to continue their mass murder campaign?
Too, what a distraction it is. Who speaks of the war crimes committed by the cowardly Israeli Zionists now that the focus is on the cutting of heads?

Nevertheless, it is the arch-Zionist war mongers who are entirely behind the ISIS hoax. Whether it is called ISIS, IS, Islamic State, Islamic Caliphate, and/or ISIF is irrelevant. It is all merely world Jewry propaganda. The entire entity relishes in the creation of phobias, Islamophobia being its most prominent one. Even so, the plethora of names alone is categorical evidence of the fraud. Does any actual Muslim resistance group have so many odd and sundry names? Clearly, this is not the case.

Too, who is the lone phony beheader? He is a Jew, not a Muslim.
Per PressTV:
In the footage, Haines also accused British premiers for not having the “courage to say no to the Americans.”
“Unfortunately, it is we, the British public that will, in the end, pay the price for our Parliament’s selfish decisions,” Haines said, referring to Britain’s engagement in war on the ISIL.
The British victim, who is a 44-year-old father of two from Perth in Scotland, was reportedly captured in Iraq last year.
Another hostage, identified as Alan Henning, was shown at the end of the video, with the masked terrorist saying he would be killed if Cameron continued fighting the ISIL.
The video was shot in a desert setting similar to the two previous ones with the victim wearing an orange jumpsuit.
It’s the same background as seen in the other hoax ISIS beheading clips.
Arch-Zionist mole Rita Katz used to put her logo on the videos. Not any more, not that she has been exposed for doing so.

Picture 5613
Here is a screen-grab from the Sotloff phony. There is no doubt about it he is alive and well. So is Haines.
This time there is not only no SITE logo, but there is also no fake sawing back and forth. That was omitted, as posters first alerted the world to this fake, as did a number of other Internet researchers. No fake sawing; that would be quickly exposed as proof of the fraud, that is the fact that there was apparent cutting of the throat but no surging of blood.
It’s like the other fakes. There is no proof of any beheading. That part is conveniently nonexistent in the video. Just with this fact alone how can anyone claim it as real?

Haines has a rather long, skinny neck. Where is this British spy’s neck or even a portion of that neck material? Did it shrivel away into the torso? Like the Foley and Sotloff fraud it is merely a head seen tilted at an angle, in this case and the case of the Foley hoax against the arm. In the above photo it is pointed out that there appears to be fake blood brush marks. In the arrow on the right a triplicate patter of dots is noted, following a triangular pattern, which is typical of Photoshop manipulation. Two such triplicate patterns are seen.
Triplicate patterns are seen as a result of heavy Photoshop manipulation, which was clearly the case, here. The crude three dot pattern is seen in two different multiple places, as is evident from close inspection. Regardless, it is completely anomalous and makes no sense in the event a real, natural photograph. Moreover, notice what is marked out by the green arrow. it is a repetitive blood pattern, also in a kind of triplicate pattern. This is clearly the result of computer manipulation versus the random spurting expected from actual arterial severing. The vile, hedonistic Zionists are trying harder. It is no matter; close-up inspection will always reveal the truth, that is whether it is real or fake.

Therefore, no doubt, this beheading is a fraud. The head is merely a Photoshop computer-generated fake. It’s a hoax, like the others.

Too, the flesh tones of Haine’s skin are too rich. Naturally light-skinned after the beheading the face should be far more pale, as he would have been in a real neck cutting drained of arterial blood and oxygen, which give color to the skin.
In fact, the post fake beheading tones are actually richer – or as rich – as his skin prior to the headless imagery.

In the computer-generated image Haines was give a tan. Too, it is clear: he had not Photoshop triplicate ‘blisters‘ on his face prior to the beheading hoax image. Nor was his hair so obviously razor-edged. THE BLISTERS PROVE that this video is an absolute hoax, purely a staged event.

Haines speaks and raises his eyebrow
Then, too, what about what happens right before the knife is presumably raised before the neck? What about the Haine’s wink-like reaction, as seen in the video, where he dramatically raises up his left eyebrow. He appears to say something just before doing so, something like ‘I will…” Is that not a signal to go ahead. Was “I will” a response to “Stay relaxed; don’t move; let me handle this?” 

Regardless, they are both spies working in unison. 

What else would be expected from these hostile agents, who have invaded the oil rich Middle East with the goal of undermining Islamic unity?
Haines says something. What is he doing saying anything if this was a real beheading?

He then raises is left eyebrow; it is quite dramatic on the video.

Unlike the Foley fake this time the Zionists did not throw the knife down as a prop. Nevertheless, this clearly proves that all these videos are hoaxes, as the same general pattern is used throughout, the same hoax Zionist faker acting as the beheading agent, the fact that this individual is all by himself, the staging of the filming with intermissions, and the same method of positioning the phony corpses. There is also the same use of the paint and blur tools of Photoshop, with the identifiable patterns as the marker.
The heads are always at an angle. What do the Zionists seek to achieve with this element of the imagery? Why not have the photoshopped heads placed straight up?

It’s all paint-brushed and computer generated. There is nothing real about these beheadings. All these men, Zionist spies, are still alive. The drama is merely a tool for wretched, vile Zionist Jews, who seek to create a grand distraction. All such fakes occurred after the placement of pressure upon the Zionist entity for war crimes. All are tools to create the basis for an increase in the murderous war campaigns of antagonistic Western powers in the Middle East and to justify mass murder of the innocents.

Additionally, spies, by which Sotloff, Foley, and Haines all can be identified, continuously change their identities. Fake deaths among them is routine. Additionally, Sotloff is a Jewish extremist. Why has no one mentioned anything in the media about an Israeli agent being beheaded by Muslim extremists?
Thanks to posters for calling this out as a fake. You are the best.

If Labour wins, they're preparing to slip this little idea past you

Mr Savage informed the viewing audience that:
- There will be a constitutional reset.
- This reset would be facilitated through referenda held at the parish level.
More or less the suggestion proposed by David Miliband. In addition Mr Savage suggested replacing Britain’s complex tax regime with a bank transaction tax, and that the money so raised could be used to offer everyone in the country a “living wage” of £7500 per year. This was “the hook”.
But then came the barb. Mr Savage explained that he and his colleagues “have discussed this idea (Constitutional re-set) with many groups countrywide who were broadly in support of this approach. One group we spoke to were a group of environmentalists at the London School of Economics.”
That’s the same London School of Economics which has long been a hotbed of Miliband Fabian Marxism.
In a little name-dropping to add credibility to his Reset proposals, Mr Savage added that Polly Higgins had been looking to bring in a law of “ecocide” and that Michael Meacher MP suggested that in order to overcome the existing constitutional deadlock there would need to be a social movement built. Mr Savage clearly views the Reset as that social movement.

TAP - It sounds perfect, until you realise you have no rights.  It's Agenda 21.  Be ready to resist.  This will be sprung after the next election.

Hear insiders discuss how they do endless false flags to get wars started

Hi Tap,

I think that transcript of the man speaking at the end of this video to an in-house Government group about the necessity to create false flag events to achieve the end goal of war speaks volumes.  Do you or does anyone know exactly who that man is and who he was talking to?

“I frankly think that crisis initiations are really tough and that it’s very hard for me to see how the United States President can get us to war with Iran…. 
Which leads me to conclude that if, in fact, compromise is not company, that the traditional way that America gets to war is, what would be best for U.S. interests?!
Some people might think Mr Roosevelt wanted to get us into WW2, as David mentioned, but you may recall, he had to wait for Pearl Harbour.

Some people might think Mr Wilson wanted to get us into WW1…… you may recall, he had to wait for the Lusitania episode.
Some people might think that Mr Johnson wanted to send troops to Vietnam… may recall, he had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode.

We didn’t go to war with Spain until the U.S.S. Maine exploded. 
And may I point out that Mr Lincoln did not feel he could call up the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the Commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack.
So, if in fact if the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war! 

One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mention that explosion on August 17th……. We could step up the pressure!

I mean look people…..  Iranian submarines periodically go down!  Some day one of them might not come up!  Who would know why?!

We can do a variety of things, if we wish to increase the pressure!
I’m not advocating that…. But I’m just suggesting  that this is not an either/or proposition.  It’s just sanctions have to succeed or other things!

We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians……. We could get nastier!!!!!”


Monday, September 15, 2014

Karen Hudes tells her story, and how the world's bankers think and behave

While the military might of the USA is given over to promote the interests of the Vatican, and SMOMs are put into place to hold the wealth of the world flowing to the Vatican, the dollar will be destroyed as the world's reserve currency, and American military might will no longer be pre-eminent.

Hudes says the secrets are spilling out.

The Trans Pacific Partnership is a non-starter.

Fukushima was done to punish Japan for starting to break away from the financial cartel.   Hudes says gold will be the new world currency.  Who knows?

Scotland. Independence is not on the table. Mike Robinson. UK Column.

Today the LibLabCon has joined forces to keep the Union together, they say. Very publicly “abandoning” Prime Ministers Questions in order to give the maximum impression that they actually wish to keep the Union together, all three have flown up to Scotland to campaign for a “NO” vote.

Scotland Ballot Box

The Three Stooges are playing a clever psychological game. Their intention is clear as evidenced by the constitutional reform agenda - the breakup of the Union. They give the impression that they are fighting for Scotland to stay in the Union in the full knowledge that any right thinking Scotsman or woman will struggle to resist the temptation to punch them on the nose at first sight. 
The inevitable consequence, therefore, is that more and more people are being pushed into a “yes” vote. And just in case the polls show it to be too close to call, there’s plan ‘B’, that 20% rise in the number of postal votes and the fact that EU citizens can vote to help guarantee things, but far be it from me to suggest there would be any sort of rigging or the result going on.
And even if it still goes against them, out pops Gordon Brown to detail plan ‘C’ - even more devolved powers. In other words, you’re getting it, whether you want it or not.
In last week’s Crane Report, Ian Crane argued strongly for people to vote “yes”, to take the bull by the horns and go for independence. 
But if you look at the political leadership that is available, what have you got. Alex Salmond, friend of Prince Charles according to this 2009 Telegraph article, and protector of paedophiles, apparently.
Salmond also seems to have given away any Republican intentions long ago.
And if you look at the economic situation, there are no solutions on the table. No national credit, no national infrastructure plans, not even an answer for what currency Scotland will use.
Even Mark Carney recognises that Salmond’s desire to hold onto the pound is nonsense.
What we are witnessing here is classic British divide and conquer tactics. Right at the time that all the people of Britain need to stand together against these paedophile yes men in Parliament, they have very successfully made sure that the whole Scottish population is looking the other way.
Once Scotland makes that decision, the Scottish people are no longer in a position to do anything about what happens in Westminster.
It isn’t the Scottish government which is driving for war with Russia. And all of a sudden, a large proportion of the British population will no longer be able to do anything about David Cameron and his bought and paid for cabinet.
So while we should all support a nation's right to self determination, I would argue that such a right should be carefully considered, particularly in light of the constitutional, geopolitical and economic crises we find ourselves in. 

A New Bill Of Rights. Why Human Rights Are So Dangerous. The threat to common law.

David Cameron intends to introduce a new "law" which will, according to the Daily Express, make clear that the UK Parliament is "supreme".

David Cameron, Nick Clegg

Cameron is using the European Convention on Human Rights as the "problem" for which his solution is to throw out the British Constitution. His intention is to give the appearance of being anti-EU in order to undermine Common Law and impose European style human rights legislation in the guise of a "new bill of rights".
Of course, in a crass attempt to appear that he opposes such a move, the very man originally tasked with implementing a new bill of rights, Nick Clegg, is pretending that it in doing what he is doing in the way he has done it, David Cameron is "turning [his] back on a long, long British tradition of upholding human rights across the world."

The Danger of Human Rights

The European model of "human rights" is dangerous. It is a model which we should be fighting tooth and nail to prevent taking hold in this country. It is based upon the premise that as a starting point, humans have no rights. The only rights that humans have at the end of the day are those written in legislation, whatever the source of that legislation might be.
To reiterate, then: the basis of human rights law is that humans have no rights except those the political elite decide to grace us with.
So when commentators write that human rights "are not something that can be repealed or taken away", this is a downright lie. When they say that human rights "extend to everyone", they only do so within the scope of the range of rights expressed in the legislation.

Common Law

Here in Britain, we have taken a different view for centuries. This is a view diametrically opposite to the European view. Here in Britain we have unlimited inalienable rights. Or at least, the only limitation on our rights is where we infringe upon someone elses. In other words this nation is built on the presumption of liberty. We can do as we please unless the law says we can’t. And by law, I mean common law. Not judge led, jury led. And not Parliamentary legislation, better known as Parliamentary whim.

The New Bill Of Rights

Any attempt to implement a new bill of rights is, then, a deliberate act of fraud by Cameron and Clegg. They are playing a game of faux opposition, not only between themselves, but with the EU as well. In doing so they intend to remove our inalienable rights and replace them with very limited, very transient "human rights". In doing so they intend to create a "Bill of Rights" which just happens to have the same name as the 1689 Bill of Rights. Their hope is that we will soon forget the 1689 Bill of Rights, and embrace their fascist alternative.

Nicole Kidman’s Father Dies Amid Pedophile, Child Murder ring allegations


Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:22
Dr. Antony Kidman died Friday after fleeing Australia when accused of the sexual abuse and murder of children in an elite Sydney pedophile ring. A month prior Fiona Barnett had filed a complaint with the Australian NSW police and Child Abuse Royal Commission alleging Kidman’s sexual and physical assaults on her throughout childhood. When the Commission opened an investigation the clinical psychologist suddenly left his 43 years with the Sydney University of Technology and Royal North Shore Hospital to stay in Singapore until he died. The family has refused to comment and Singapore police opened an investigation on what they termed as an unnatural death.

Yesterday Barnett released her own theory about Kidman’s death,” The main perpetrator of my child sexual abuse, Antony Kidman, is dead after I filed formal complaints accusing him of the rape, torture and murder of children in an exclusive Sydney pedophile ring. As a child victim of mind control I feel he’s been sacrificed for failing to adequately program me.”

“Kidman was responsible for ensuring that I never disclosed pedophile ring activities that I witnessed as a child,” she continued. “He failed. News of Kidman’s death impacted me, someone who has undergone intense treatment. I know that there are other victims of Kidman’s crimes out there who are perhaps not as far along the healing path as I am. I anticipate that news of Kidman’s death may have a serious impact on these victims. A perpetrator’s death can even trigger suicidal ideation.

“My complaints last month to the Australian Child Abuse Royal Commission detailed two incidents in which Kidman subjected me to horrific physical and sexual assault” Barnett said. “But there are even more serious crimes against children that I witnessed Kidman commit as a member of the elite Sydney pedophile ring. Those complaints have gone to the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels.”

Barnett spoke out the day of Kidman’s death – White Balloon Day 2014 – an event aimed at raising awareness for Australian children affected by sexual assault. She stated, “My contribution to White Balloon Day 2014 is to urge my fellow victims of crime to fight the filth that this monster deposited in their minds and if they can muster the strength, join me in my effort to give a voice to victims who are no longer with us.”

The ICLCJ Court has been looking into Barnett’s allegations against Kidman in relation to their investigation of the global elite Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult. Over sixty eyewitnesses such as Barnett have testified of Ninth Circle child sacrifice and pedophile activities that spanned the globe, including criminal activities against children in the Americas, Netherlands and UK commonwealth countries such as Australia.

The Ninth Circle was also said to have well organized and secretive human hunting parties that included pedophilia. Privately owned forest groves were believed used in the US, Canada, France and Holland. It appeared children and teens were obtained by the criminal drug syndicate Octopus, which was believed connected to the Vatican. The kidnapped children and teens were said to be stripped naked, raped, hunted down and killed.

Since the tender age of three Barnett had been trapped inside Australia’s vast pedophile network where children were sex trafficked, hunted down for sport and murdered. “In the late afternoon of Oct. 28 1975 I was taken to my sixth birthday party in the Kiama rainforest,” Barnett said. “The cordial was spiked with drugs. I fell asleep. When I awoke it was dark and I was lying naked face-up spread-eagle on a picnic table with my hands and legs tied. Perpetrators took turns sneaking up on me. A large group of men arrived in pick up trucks. They carried rifles and had a pack of starving Doberman dogs. I was told that the group of naked children huddled nearby were my responsibility. I was to run and hide them. Every child I failed to hide would be killed and fed to the dogs. They painted something on my back and chest, and then released us. I pushed the children up over the first steep hill. It was about the second or third hill that the hunting party reached us. Shots were fired and children began dropping all around me. With all hope lost of my saving the other children, I took off and ran for my life.”


In another article of the Independent Australia News it was reported that Barnett’s dramatic testimony put members in tears when she went before the Australian Royal Commission into Child Sexual Abuse. Barnett had named as her perpetrators her grandfather, Kidman, two former Australian prime ministers, a Parliament House governor general and a state police commissioner. As with child pedophile rings in the Netherlands, Europe, Canada and the US, the Australian pedophile network was said to include police officers, psychiatrists, biochemists, psychologists, actors, writers, politicians, university lecturers and medical doctors.

“The Commission was in the process of investigating my complaint when Kidman was found to have left the country,” Barnett said. “Now one month following my notification against Kidman, he is dead. Kidman’s death comes as no surprise. In the past week alone, two people predicted his imminent demise.”

This article is dedicated to victims of the Vatican and mafia-run global elite Ninth Circle Satanic Child Sacrifice Cult, and to the memory of over 50,800 missing children, some of whom rest in 34 mainly Catholic-owned unmarked mass grave sites – that have been refused excavation – across Canada, Ireland and Spain. The child perpetrators continue to live lives free of responsibility for their ongoing crimes. Our prayers are with these innocents, and should be for ourselves if we allow this Child Holocaust by our global leaders to continue.

About the Author
Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, retired, author of “Twenty Two Faces: Inside the Extraordinary Life of Jenny Hill and Her Twenty Two Multiple Personalities” ( is a retired therapist, Public Speaker, Activist and investigative journalist whose articles on international child exploitation rings have been cited on hundreds of blogs and websites. The ex-Supervisor, Alberta Mental Health and Director Provo Family Counseling Center is the CEO of Child Abuse Recovery and Speakers Bureau (

Clockwork: New ISIL Vid ‘Beheads’ Brit, Cameron Gung Ho for US Bombing Run on Syria

quote from Patrick Henningsen's 21st Century Wire. 

The criminals wear the uniform

Rotherham child-sex victim confronts her alleged abuser in the street... but SHE is arrested by a van load of police

  • Victim saw man she says abused her walking the town's streets
  • The now 28-year-old challenged him over claims of grooming and violence
  • But when police arrived, she was handcuffed and arrested by officers
  • She was 'shoved into van' by two officers in 'thuggish' arrest, witness says
  • Police later realised they had been hoping to interview her over claims
  • She refused to speak to them after she was reportedly pushed against wall
A victim of Rotherham's child sex abuse scandal confronted a man she says groomed her - but was left shocked when she was the one arrested.
The woman was shocked when she saw the man walking through the town's centre on Friday and decided to challenge him over the allegations.
But she was tackled by two police officers and pushed up against a wall during her 'thuggish' arrest, a witness has said.
Scroll down for video 

A victim of child sex abuse was arrested in Rotherham town centre on Friday after tackling a man she accuses of abusing her when she was younger. File photo
A damning report released last month detailed how 1,400 children were sexually exploited in the area over a 16-year period.
The Times reported that a woman whose case is being investigated by authorities - but has not yet been interviewed - was arrested after tackling a man she says groomed her when she was 15.
A witness accused the police of 'acting like insensitive thugs', telling the paper: 'A police van came and six male officers piled out.
'Two of them dragged her away, handcuffed her, put her against a wall and then shoved her into the back of the van.'
South Yorkshire Police told today how they had been hoping to interview the woman in the weeks before the arrest, after they were told of the historic allegations by another organisation.
But they only realised that she was the woman they had been trying to speak to after her arrest, and have now released her on bail.
Public anger over the scandal has been fanned by the refusal of Police and Crime Commissioner Shaun Wright to resign
Public anger over the scandal has been fanned by the refusal of Police and Crime Commissioner Shaun Wright to resign
After her treatment at the hands of officers, the woman has been reluctant to talk to police and her complaint against the man is therefore yet to be officially recorded.
The police force, which has come under fire in the wake of the recent scandal, insists it does take sexual violence seriously and will continue attempts to investigate the woman's claims.
A spokesman said: 'Specialist officers from South Yorkshire Police had been making efforts to trace a 28-year-old woman who had made allegations to a partner agency.
'The allegations related to child sexual exploitation. Efforts to trace the woman were unsuccessful.
'Later that day, officers from a neighbouring force who were providing support to South Yorkshire Police, were approached by a passerby who made complaints about the behaviour of a woman who they believed had been drinking.
'The woman was arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated public order offences.
'She was taken to Main Street Police Station where she was detained and later released on police bail.
'Whilst she was in custody officers realised the identity of the woman and made sensitive enquiries with her regarding her previous allegation.
'The woman chose not to speak with the officers at this current time but plans are in place to find an appropriate way to work with the woman and offer her the support she needs to come forward.'
The arrest comes after an inquiry into long-running child abuse in the area revealed families who tried to step in were in some cases themselves detained by police.

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook