Friday, April 16, 2010
Why Would You Hear Gun-Shots At An Air Crash?
Just wondering.
Some say that there would have been ammunition on the plane, which would have been exploding. That's plausible.
The 'locals' pulled out to describe the crash on RT were most unconvincing. One of the boys said, 'there was no explosion' during a long description. Why would he say that?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
5 comments:
This is a very interesting footage. It seems important, so why isn't it being shown in any news? It should be used as part of the investigation.
I did see it shown in the Russian news but it was censored and the gunshot moments were cut out...weird
The wheels and undercarriage are upside down. There is no fuselage left at all. That means the aircraft crashed on its back falling from the sky without power and no longer in flight.
A wing must have detached at sufficient altitude for the plane to spin over. That can hardly have been caused by a tree clipping off a wing as the plane was landing under control.
I favour the theory that the plane was shot down, for it to be so thoroughly destroyed and to crash on its back.
Here is a link to a Russian pilots' forum with photos of damaged trees relative to the plane's approach line.
http://picasaweb.google.ru/Amlmtr/MWzNeJ#5459881356386012002
Just getting reports that the guy who shot this video was stabbed and taken to hospital.
He was on life support, when two men arrived, switched offhis life support machine and stabbed him again and killed him.
The Russian authorities are saying the stabbings were a coincidence.
Source to follow later, but I trust the person who gave me the verbal report, as I know him well.
If it was exploding ammunition, the bangs would have been irregular. They were not.
Post a Comment