Monday, February 28, 2011

''Inside Job'' Documentary Warns The World

This documentary explains to the American people what has happened to them, with the financial world being let free from control.  It is now out of control.  That also means what has happened to the rest of the world, and is still happening.  The full consequences are yet to be felt.  A telling phrase from this award-winning documentary is ''It is a Wall Street government''.  The power of money runs politics, not the other way round, and that means the power of money is running the world, with politics a sham.  It's hardly news, but it helps people to realise what the situation is.  It does not help in understanding how the situation will be resolved, though.  That will have to be a military coup d'état.

What else can re-establish the natural structures of power?  Let alone Libya, it is America and Europe that need an overthrow of the powers that control them.  Because if there isn't a coup d'etat against the One World Government, the process of enslavement and destruction has a lot further to run.   Agenda 21, in the clip below, of The United Nations is the most evil program ever to devised by any organisation throughout history.  It is already enacted into American law, and merely awaits the moment when the totalitarian regime that runs the world is ready to openly declare its existence.


RealEconTV - The Academy Award for Best Documentary this year went to "Inside Job." The winner stood up and said in calm, even tones in essence that Wall Street bankers need to start going to jail. The audience applauded and hundreds of millions of people who never watch or read the news (or understand it it they do), got the message. 

And that is not even the half of it.

British Bribery Act Eases Path Of Corruption

Coming into effect within the next three months is a new British Bribery Act, which is intended to bring British bribery legislation into line with German and American laws.  It really is most helpful to defence lawyers as it provides a whole raft of new defences to accusations of the common law crime of Bribery.

The concept of bribery is not as easy to define as one might imagine.  The old common law definition of 'behaviour that tends to corrupt' is being replaced with a relativistic definition, viz. that of making payments, or giving benefits in order to achieve an 'improper advantage'.  Of course the term 'improper' is open to interpretation, and what is thought of as improper in London, would no doubt be held to be very different to what is improper in say Riyadh. 

It might even be thought of as 'improper' to not offer inducements. 

Over time what is thought ''improper'' could of course vary.   Impropriety has no hard definition.  It is all about what might offend popular notions. The removal of the term ''corruption '' from the definition of bribery is indeed a defence lawyer's dream come true.

That aside, the prosecution in a bribery case will have to demonstrate a number of things.  First, under Section 9, that an act of bribery has taken place beyond reasonable doubt.  That, however is not sufficient to achieve a conviction, even though you would think such a case would be open and shut.  The prosecution also has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the agent who paid the bribe has a relationship of service or agency to the principle.  If therefore a company used its regular agents in a country like Saudi Arabia to arrange some inducements to be paid to an official, the relationship to the principle would be easy to establish.

But if payments were arranged via an agent who was hired exclusively for the purpose of paying bribes to secure a contract, there might well be insufficient evidence on which to secure a conviction.  This would be the case even more so, if, for example, the finance was arranged in a cryptic manner, separated in space and time, for example a year later, via a Swiss bank, as would no doubt be a normal procedural safeguard for this kind of business.

But even if the prosecutor's office was able to prove both the act of bribery, and the agency relationship to the principle beyond reasonable doubt, the accused would still have an extensive defence available to ward off the threat of conviction.

If they could demonstrate that they had taken adequate procedures to prevent corruption within their own organisation, which were adequate to the known risk, the company could still escape conviction, even when an actual case had otherwise been proved.  As long as there was no falsification of records, designed to cover up what had happened, and the company had implemented an anti-corruption regime within its management, it could still defend successfully against a conviction for an individual act of bribery, which was not generally happening as a rule.  It could, for example, be stated that the contract had been secured without a bribe as such, but with a general promise of a willingness to negotiate future benefits to be paid, but which had not been quantified, and it was the subsequent demands of the purchaser, not directly connected to the contract achieved, which were now in question, as part of a longer term relationship.

With so many requirements on the prosecutor, and so many defences available to a defendant, it would be a very surprising case which actually made it to court.  The company would almost be wilfully seeking to be convicted to fall foul of a law with so many gaping loopholes.

With this viewpoint in mind, you have to be mildly sceptical of the determination of international governments to eradicate corruption from their midst.  The ''Integrity Initiative'' that is being pushed around the world's capitals in the slipstream of the British Bribery Act must surely be met with a mildly cynical chuckle.  This Act gives politicians all they need to fend off the penetrating enquiries of journalists into how they are getting large contracts from third world and other governments.  ''We haven't been prosecuted,'' they will rightly be able to claim.  ''And we have conformed with all the requirements of international standards with the passing of The Bribery Act''.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Tyranny Takes Over In The USA

Global Research explains how tyranny took over in the USA -

The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men
Gang aft agley,
An' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain,
For promis'd joy!
Robert Burns – 1785

No matter how hard we try, no one can control the future, and we cannot assume the future will be like the present.
Woodrow Wilson signed the law that established the Federal Reserve. He later rightly lamented having done so. He writes, "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." Oh, how right he is, and oh, the mischief the FED has wrought! But establishing the FED must have seemed right to Wilson when he signed the law.
Harry Truman had similar qualms about the CIA.
[I]t has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency. . . .
assuming the President himself possesses a knowledge of our history, a sensitive understanding of our institutions, and an insight into the needs and aspirations of the people, he needs . . . the most accurate and up-to-the-minute information on what is going on everywhere in the world, and particularly of the trends and developments in all the danger spots. . . .
every President has available to him all the information gathered by the many intelligence agencies already in existence. . . .
But their collective information reached the President all too frequently in conflicting conclusions. At times, the intelligence reports tended to be slanted to conform to established positions of a given department. . . .
Therefore, I decided to set up a special organization charged with the collection of all intelligence reports from every available source, and to have those reports reach me as President without department "treatment" or interpretations.
I wanted and needed the information in its "natural raw" state and in as comprehensive a volume as it was practical. . . . But the most important thing about this move was to guard against the chance of intelligence being used to influence or to lead the President into unwise decisions—and I thought it was necessary that the President do his own thinking and evaluating. . . .
 For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas.

Wilson would never have won the Presidency had he not agreed to do the bidding of the founders of The Fed.  He was an obscure figure catapulted to the top because he had agreed to sell out to private control of the money supply.  He might have realised too late that he had ruined his country, but he would never have become President if he hadn't agreed.

Once networks of financial and intelligence have been created, they cannot be uncreated.  And they will always start to build bigger empires, once they are brought into existence, to the point where they become more powerful than the democratic system that did that.

See whole article -

Obey The Big Society? Or Look For A New Cromwell To Free Britain.

This design was made by Brian Gerrish of UKcolumn indicating the behind-the-scenes power structure that runs Britain.  Click on the 'power' map of the UK.  You are part of it.Printer-friendly versionSend to friend
Brian Gerrish
Learn your place.  You are no more than cattle to the New World Order.  You are permitted to live only as long as you consume the products manufactured for your consumption by the giant corporations that have seized control of the planet, and as long as you don't become wealthy, live too long or breed too many children.  But don't worry.  Your early demise, and infertility, will be handled for you.  The foods that would keep you healthy will be removed from your reach, and only foods and drinks that will help you to get sick and die prematurely will be made available to you, along with vaccines that you will be panicked into accepting.

The next effort from the OWE is to control your mind.

Your children will be brainwashed at school, put on anti-depressants by doctors, and taught that Big EU Brother is the way ahead.  This is what is meant by The Big Society.  They know what's best for you and are putting the structures of your control into place.  You will be taught to enjoy your enslavement inside David Cameron's Brave New Big Society..  See this piece from Brian Gerrish's UKcolumn.

We have consistently warned that Britain is being attacked by our own government, and under the front page headline of our last edition, “Dark Actors Playing Games”, we exposed that there was a hidden agenda between the Tory Cabinet Office and the political charity Common Purpose.

In lifting the lid on the dirty deals, insider dealing, lies and cover-ups surrounding the Cabinet Office’s plan to use Common Purpose to “reframe” the Top 200 Civil Servants, we also demonstrated that there was no difference in the Tory political agenda to that of Blair / Brown NuLabour. Since the Lid Dems have now been subsumed into the Conservatives, they can also be seen to be in the same political bed.
If we continue to naively believe the traditional political model of Conservative, Labour and LibDem, which suggests that each of the three main parties has a unique and discrete brand of politics, then we will find it hard to accept that forces much deeper are acting against us. If, however, we ask a simple question - Just how can a top ‘right wing’ Conservative like Francis Maude MP work hand in hand with an extreme Fabian left-wing Socialist such as Julia Middleton, the CEO of Common Purpose? - we start to see through the smoke and mirrors. The truth is they are all working to a ‘common purpose’, have been for many years, and that purpose is overwhelmingly hostile to a sovereign British nation and our historic values, laws and customs.
An elitest dictatorship is emerging from the shadows with increasing speed. Call it socialist, communitarian or fascist it is still a dictatorship with supranational and One World Government goals.
When an attack is subversive, devious and hidden, just how do you expose it for what it is? We can write thousands of words and hundreds of articles trying to explain what is happening, but the old adage that a picture paints a thousand words is still so true. Battles are fought, won and lost on maps, and today the military uses a myriad of electronic means to produce pictures of the enemy and his tactics.  If we can’t see the enemy we can’t fight.
Our centre page diagram sets out as simply as we can the political change network at work at the heart of government. Though even the expression ‘government’ is a misnomer, since government is not a simple seat of democratic power in Westminster and the House of Lords - government is now buried in a morass of unaccountable charities, think-tanks, non-governmental organisations, pressure groups and ‘change agents’ - Cameron’s so called Big Society. The devil is in the detail of it (all).
The first revelation in the diagram is that the Prime Minister and his Chief Cabinet Office aid Francis Maude are controlled by those above. In recent weeks Head of the Civil Service, Gus o’Donnell has demonstrated that he is above our constitutional law. He has single-handedly produced the ‘Cabinet Manual’ - a so called compendium of the laws, conventions and constitutional underpinning of the UK system of government. His directives allowed Brown to remain in post after the public had voted him out at the last general election, and at the same time blocked Cameron from taking office. More recently O’Donnell was able to refuse to disclose critical information at Chilcott inquiry - just who is this man, and from where does his power come?
Closely linked to O’Donnell are Geoff Mulgan (Young Foundation) and Julia Middleton (Common Purpose). Perhaps surprisingly for true conservatives, both are spawn of the marxist based think tank Demos, and are driving a hard line socialist communitarian agenda. Aside from driving Blair’s Forward Strategy Unit, Mulgan’s plans also include the remaking of charities to suite a new political agenda. Through the Young Foundation, he is a key socialist policy driver, exerting almost guru-like influence through the spectrum of government training organisations such as the National School of Government, Institute for Government and others. He appears to have powerful and willing financial backers for his initiatives.
Happy to quote Marx in her book Beyond Authority, Middleton is desperate to change adult and children’s behaviour to create ‘new leaders’ in society. She is a personal friend of Maude, and believes that a fifth column can be used to achieve political change. Also great friends with the top international banks ranging from Deutsche Bank to the now defunct Lehman Brothers, as well as media moguls, and the rich, great and good, Julia is also happy to quote and use East German tactics of exploiting ‘useful idiots’, to achieve her political agenda. Cameron and Maude are active with both the Young Foundation and Common Purpose. Yet they are supposedly Tories?
Having exposed direct links between Common Purpose and the Cabinet Office, it came as no surprise to discover a Behavioural Change Unit within the Cabinet Office. Shown in the box at the bottom of the diagram, we feature the Director, Dr Halpen, and expose many other names that the Cabinet Press office tried to hide. Their agenda is psychological reprogramming / reframing of the British public to achieve political and social change. Their agenda is well suited to the Common Purpose model. Other significant and surprising links shown include the Young Foundation, the Franco British Council, the DEMOS Advisory Panel for Progressive Conservatism and the White House.
Most explosive in our network diagram is the powerful position of the Franco British Council (FBC), now shown to be driving British political policy, including defence (in conjunction with the Royal United Services Institute, RUSI). As a registered charity, working to political ends, FBC fits both the Mulgan and Middleton model. Much more sinister is the fact that Cameron has used FBC within 10 Downing Street to plan yet more psychological and behavioural change initiatives for the British general public - even using French President Sarkozy’s top neuro expert Prof. Olivier Ouillier.
Central to the quisling network is the public sector, such as DWP, Dept Health and Ministry of Defence, shown with logos in the centre of the diagram. Documents seen by the UK Column indicate that the staff within these departments are to be politically and socially re-framed as a priority by means of internal Behavioural Change Units. Once this process has been completed, the ‘reframed’ departments will then be better placed to run Behavioural Change programmes for the public and the wider spread of Charities, Trusts, Local Government, Local Government Training Organisations, and NGOs of the Third Sector. Highly active within this mix is the Oxford Said Business school, itself linked to Common Purpose and French NLP experts.
The Cabinet Office has already lied about contracts with Common Purpose. To date the Cabinet Office has also refused to reveal the value of the Common Purpose behavioural training received by the Top 200 Civil Servants. The press office has also totally denied the use of Neuro Linguistic Programming NLP, although we are already aware of contracts by NLP World, Coaching Leaders NLP and Life Coach NLP. Why would the Cabinet office want to lie? As a further example of the pressure to implement behavioural training, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) spent some £25 million on behavioural change under the guidance of Helen Ghosh, even before setting up their Behavioural Unit. Ghosh is now Permanent Secretary of the Home Office.
So secret are the Behavioural Reframing Units that, just as with the Cabinet Office media team, the Defra press office refused to reveal to the UK Column who was in charge, how many were in the team and what their annual budget was. Welcome to Cameron’s transparency in government.

Lord Wei - Big Society Guru.  Aged 33 years.

Just what is all this behavioural reframing about? Our diagram shows top right that both the public sector and the Big Society initiative are being used to change the values, behaviour and beliefs of every single member of society. Most worryingly for parents, Lord Wei has been parachuted in by Cameron to lead the Big Society. His connections and interests lie with children and he is an advisor to the Government Office for Civil Society. Only 33 years old, we wonder where his knowledge or wisdom to lead society come from? Certainly he will be well aquainted with the immensely powerful industrial military firms such as Vickers and BAE Systems that are lining up to take control of the Academy System (ARK) schools. Taking children from pre-school to 18 years old, the Academy system will include on site Children’s Services and behavioural ‘therapy’ - sounds familiar doesn’t it?
The British public - individuals and families - men, women and children are the target of the “Quisling Brainwashing Network.”  Alongside the political lies, corrupt courts, fraudulent banks and heavy-handed police, we are now to be psychologically attacked not just to obey the new political elite, but to be happy doing so. The danger is real and obvious. Talk about it, tell your friends, laugh at it, refuse to be conned, bring your MP to account. Say no! The use of psychological manipulation without your permission is assault.
Need we say more?

I am not sure anyone can stop this process apart from a government determined to bring back independence from the OWE.  If elections are being rigged to order, and now with the forthcoming mechanisation of voting, taken beyond any chance of a rebuilding of our democracy, the only path back is via a military coup.  All we can do is prepare peoples' minds for that eventuality.

Only the Army would have the power to seize back the country that has been taken away from us.  It wouldn't be the first time in history that Parliament has become hopelessly corrupted and ''Kings'' overly powerful.  When a modern Oliver Cromwell appears, he should be supported by the people of Britain.  He can throw out the garbage that has rotted our country, and we can start all over again.  It's only three hundred and fifty odd years ago since we last needed him.  As they say,  the history book on the shelf is always repeating itself.

The AV YES side Are Funded By ERS Purveyors Of Electoral Machination

Anonymous says:
Ireland tried electronic voting but gave it up because you could not trust the lack of a paper trail. Labour postal votes anyone?
  • 244
    Tapestry says:
    That’s exactly why they want it. Election results can be keyed in to order, and made to match the detailed voting with ease. They are not counting machines, but cheating machines, where one controller at a PC can decide the election result, and no one can know where the cheating was done, as the details are smoothly adjusted in a way that will not alert suspicion.
    By having counting centres, the people at Constituency level take responbsibility for their count. You need a lot of ”people” in place in local authorities to rig a seat, which is not impossible, but needs a lot more management than a machine-based system, where the trail is invisible.
    By making the whole election linked up to one information system, there is only a single point of control at the top.
    If anything there should be more counting centres not less. Each polling station should do its own count, and communicate its results to a central counting location by email and mobile phone.  The voting could be easy to verify at that level, and no ballot boxes need moving anywhere.  At the same time, the information should be copied to the media, so that all news organisations can do their own count at the same time as the Constituency and central controllers do their sums. That way the opportunities to rig seats would be reduced not increased, as will be the case with electoral ''machination''. The very word means rigging, does it not?
    Once AV is in place, and counting responsibility removed from Constituencies, electoral rigging becomes a simple affair.  The polls coming up to election day need to state the result you want.  All the machine will do is bring it about, as the machine operator indicates.

    GUIDO -

    UPDATE : The Speccie have a scoop on the milllion quid donation from ERS to the “Yes to AV”campaign, ERS is funded by ERS Ltd which, errm, runs electronic voting systems. What does the ERS say about electronic voting? It is the future appparently they say because:
    • It encourages electoral participation, especially among the young, who are by far the group least likely to vote.
    • Voting online can include better links between the vote and the information on which a vote should be based, thus leading to more informed decisions.
    • By logging all votes electronically, the counting process is carried out more-or-less instantly.
    So it looks like Yes to £250 million (and the rest) of electronic voting machines run by ERS Ltd…

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Hague Pumps Up The Panic In Libya. You'd Think He Was After Something

Global Research

There is no question that Colonel Muammar Al-Gaddafi (Al-Qaddafi) is a dictator. He has been the dictator and so-called “qaid” of Libya for about 42 years. Yet, it appears that tensions are being ratcheted up and the flames of revolt are being fanned inside Libya. This includes earlier statements by the British Foreign Secretary William Hague that Colonel Qaddafi had fled Libya to Venezuela. [1] This statement served to electrify the revolt against Qaddafi and his regime in Libya.
Although all three have dictatorship in common, Qaddafi’s Libya is quite different from Ben Ali’s Tunisia or Mubarak’s Egypt. The Libyan leadership is not outright subservient to the United States and the European Union. Unlike the cases of Tunisia and Egypt, the relationship that exists between Qaddafi and both the U.S. and E.U. is a modus vivendi. Simply put, Qaddafi is an independent Arab dictator and not a “managed dictator” like Ben Ali and Mubarak.
In Tunisia and Egypt the status quo prevails, the military machine and neo-liberalism remain intact; this works for the interests of the United States and the European Union. In Libya, however, upsetting the established order is a U.S. and E.U. objective.

The U.S. and the E.U. now seek to capitalize on the revolt against Qaddafi and his dictatorship with the hopes of building a far stronger position in Libya than ever before. Weapons are also being brought into Libya from its southern borders to promote revolt. The destabilization of Libya would also have significant implications for North Africa, West Africa, and global energy reserves.

What's next?  ''Humanitarian'' Intervention

The media is pumping the panic.  There seems to be an agenda.  If the West sends in military forces, it won't be a humanitarian effort but a corporate takeover as happened in Iraq, to seize Libya's valuable assets.

Assange Is Kidnapped By Legal System Without Charges Laid

This moment epitomises the abandonment of any pretence to a system of justice.  No charges have been made against Assange, yet he has been extradited to Sweden.  No evidence has been provided.  The mere request by Sweden to remove Assange is all it takes for a person in Britain to lose their freedom, and be sent overseas for an unknown period of time.  The next element of injustice in the Assange case will be the holding of his trial in Sweden  in secret.  After that, who knows?  There is no system of justice to even pretend that it is in existence any longer.  This moment will be one to remember, as the world, first described in George Orwell's 1984, descends over us all.

Banned - Nature's Health In a Bottle

Remember these?  The days when milk tasted better than Coke.  Branded drinks didn't stand a chance, until pasteurisation killed off demand for milk as a drink.

Today I experienced something I hadn't done for forty years.  I had just finished whacking tennis balls with my coach for one and a half hours, and for the first time strayed over to the shop of the Country Club, I had recently joined, to find some refreshment.  While browsing the options available, I noticed that one whole fridge was packed with a single brand of what it termed 'whole milk'.  I wouldn't normally buy milk after sport.  Usually I'd go for some branded drink like Gatorade, but the whole fridge was filled with nothing else, and it made me curious.

The first sip was a shock.  I hadn't tasted milk topped with cream for nearly forty years when we used to run a Shropshire dairy farm.  The second mouthful I realised what we had been missing all these years since supermarket pasteurised milk was all we were permitted to buy by government regulators.

But why?  It's simply because, if real unpasteurised whole milk was made available, brands like Coke, Gatorade and other artificial drinks filled with colourants and preservatives wouldn't get a look-in.  There wasn't even one such drink available in this store, where hundreds of people play sports every day.  There's no point.  They all want the milk.

Pasteurisation has done as much to ruin health as any regulatory measure.  If so much food value was made available so cheaply, vitamins, minerals combined with delicious irresistible taste, the food industry wouldn't have a role.  And that, of course, is why pasteurisation was brought in.  Somehow milk had to be stopped.

Next time I'm in the Country Club,  I'll buy four pints, one to drink immediately, two for the house and one to make yoghurt.  It makes me feel angry that we've been deprived of such a simple pleasure as whole unpasteurised milk by government regulators for so long, and of so much simply available good health.  What they haven't stopped by de-qualifying the milk-drinking experience by killing off its taste and food value, they've done with media propaganda against dairy products.  You can hardly read a health magazine anywhere without some anti-milk propaganda being included.   Yet whole unpasteurised milk is simply the most competitive way to get cheap healthy food into people that exists.  In a world dominated by chemical corporations, this little natural secret is another one that just had to be got rid of.

For a couple of months, while I'm still in my winter home, I will carry on enjoying the discovery of real milk, even though we're right in the tropics.  The crazy thing is that when I get back to Shropshire, where there are more cows per acre than anywhere else on the planet, I won't be able to drink real milk.  That's the power of corporations who have manipulated law-making and regulation of foods in their own interests through all my adult life.

TetraPak's soulless description of the pasteurisation process -

Beverage pasteurisation

Beverage pasteurisation is the heat-treatment to eliminate micro-organisms present and to ensure the desired shelf life for the beverage. The carefully designed pasteurisation process safeguards flavours and nutrients in the beverage product.
The pasteurisation conditions are chosen for each beverage based on its specific properties. The temperature ranges from 85°C for juices to 138°C for Asian teas and the holding times typically vary between 5 and 30  seconds.
For beverages that are packaged aseptically and do not require refrigeration, it is necessary that aseptic conditions are secured throughout the process, preventing any recontamination of the pasteurised product. Other pasteurisation systems are designed for cold-filling, where the hygienically filled beverage is distributed in the cold chain, or for hot-filling of beverages to be shipped at ambient conditions.
Tetra Pak’s pasteurisation systems are designed for high energy recovery and minimal product waste that ensure low operating costs and maximum protection of the environment. The flexibility to handle a wide range of beverages in the same pasteurisation system, allows producers to respond quickly to new market needs.

We Could Have Had This

Eminent Natural Hygiene proponent Dr. Herbert M. Shelton devotes a large section of one of his books (Orthotrophy, freely available from to the enormous difference in health value existing between pasteurized milk (not health- and in fact disease-promoting) and unheated raw milk.
Additionally, the value of raw milk is very different according to soil quality and the way in which the animals are kept. This is described in some detail by dentist Dr. Heard in his book "Man Versus Toothache" [which you can also download from]. He describes how RAW milk from cows that have grazed on grass rich in minerals and trace elements, constitutes an excellent source of all elements needed for maintaining and restoring dental (and likely other) health, while pasteurized milk has lost all tooth-building and -protective (as well as possibly all other health-giving) values.

Why sound so surprised that milk is an all round deliverer of life's health requirements?  Calves grow from the moment they are born into strong adults on nothing else.  We humans are no different in our needs.  God, we sound dumb sometimes, when the simple truths of the world have been obliterated by commercial interests.  The media are the greatest threat to our health of all.  Common sense would tell you that their hatred of milk is nothing other than sheer envy.

US Transport Police Pat Down Kids AFTER They Get Off A Train

It's looks a bit pervy all told.  Kids being thoroughly patted down by the TSA, the USA's notorious Transpportation Security Agency.  But just one question.  What's the point with doing all this as people get OFF their train.  This family had just arrived in Savannah, Georgia and were incredulous.  I'm not surprised.  It's down right stupid.  Bhe TSA doesn't care.  Their mission is to induce a spirit if subjugation and subservience in America'population, as the Federal Government readies people for martial law and internment, prior to genocide and depopulation operations.

Global Research -

The Intensive Quiet Preparations for Martial Law
Let us deal first with the preparations for martial law. In late September 2008, at the height of the financial meltdown, The Army Times announced the redeployment of an active Brigade Army Team from Iraq to America, in a new mission that "may become a permanent part of the active Army":
The 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys.
Now they’re training for the same mission – with a twist – at home.
Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks… After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one... They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control.[18]
This announcement followed by two weeks the talk of civil unrest and martial law that was used to panic the Congress into passing Paulson’s bailout legislation. Not only that, the two unprecedented events mirror each other: the bailout debate anticipated civil unrest and martial law, while the announced positioning of an active Brigade Combat Team on U.S. soil anticipated civil unrest (such as might result from the bailout legislation).
Then on December 17, 2008, U.S. Northern Command chief General Renuart announced that "the US military plans to mobilize thousands of troops to protect Washington against potential terrorist attack during the inauguration of president-elect Barack Obama."[19]
The U.S. Army War College also raised the possibility of the U.S. Army being used to control civil unrest, according to the Phoenix Business Journal:
A new report by the U.S. Army War College talks about the possibility of Pentagon resources and troops being used should the economic crisis lead to civil unrest, such as protests against businesses and government or runs on beleaguered banks.
"Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security," said the War College report.
The study says economic collapse, terrorism and loss of legal order are among possible domestic shocks that might require military action within the U.S.[20]
It is clear that there has been a sustained move in the direction of martial law preparations, a trend that has been as continuous as it has been unheralded. Senator Leahy was thus right to draw our attention to it on September 29, 2006, in his objections to the final form of the Fiscal Year 2007 National Defense Authorization Act, which gave the president increased power to call up the National Guard for law enforcement:
It... should concern us all that the Conference agreement includes language that subverts solid, longstanding Posse Comitatus statutes that limit the military’s involvement in law enforcement, thereby making it easier for the President to declare martial law. There is good reason for the constructive friction in existing law when it comes to martial law declarations.[21]
This quiet agglomeration of military power has not "just growed", like Topsy, through inadvertence. It shows sustained intention, even if no one has made a public case for it.

Friday, February 25, 2011

US Government Is Seizing All Water As State Property

This is it.  You don't own your own rain water.  You can't take water from a puddle on your land.  If you do, you will be breaking the law.  The power of the Federal Government, now firmly in the hands of the One World Empire, is unstoppable.  All water belongs to the government, from hereon.  This is total tyranny.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Why Does Ken Clarke Want The Thugs Out Of Jail?

What's that sword for, lad?
It takes some working out.  Why would a Conservative government want to shorten prison sentences and stop people being locked up who are a danger to society?

The point is that Ken Clarke is a Conservative in name only.  He is a dedicated Europhile and a Bilderberger, in short a supporter of the One World Empire.  He is nothing less than a totalitarian, who is happy for democracy to be the sham that it has become across the developed world.

Election are rigged.  The media is controlled.  Political leaders are carefully inserted into place.

The only force within society that the totalitarians fear is the military.  Only the army has the potential power to stop them from getting total control.

The army is ground down fighting long drawn out wars, where no end is required by the government.  The objective is to win and hold territory where either oil is located, as in Iraq, or coal as in Kosovo, or a pipeline is needed as in Afghanistan to bypass Russia.  The other objective to keep the armed forces busy, and to grind down their morale to the point that they don't present any threat to the subjugation of their nations into One World Empire Supranational structures.

What the totalitarians need to keep the army back is a second paramilitary force with no loyalty to country, or to long regimental traditions, but merely to pay-off.  What better material for such a brutish concept than the large numbers of violent criminals who should be in jail.  Only these such would be capable of being placed into such an outfit, and be willing to attack or arrest regular troops, were they ever to be so foolish as to challenge the current holders of political power.

Why else are Britain's armed forces being reduced to the point of ineffectiveness, and placed under foreign command?  The SAS, for example, which functions from a philosophy of independent action, is especially dangerous to the OWE.  Why else would they be placed under French command?  There their potential to think about what is happening to their own country, and to wonder if it might be able to be stopped and reversed, is greatly reduced.

This is where Ken Clarke's army of disloyal thugs would also be most useful.  The OWE needs forces that they can rely on not to rebel, to whom mere payoff is sufficient reward.  The massed ranks of criminals who resent regular society are the perfect candidates.

The army should act now, and seize power in Britain.  They should throw out all the current traitors like Cameron, Clarke and Hague,  and throw out the power of EU judges to impose their priorities.  They should arrest and charge Blair, Brown, Portillo and the other traitors with treason, those who allowed acts of false flag terrorism to be committed against British citizens on the 7th July 2004.

Only the army is left.  The only thing that can save Britain from being sucked into the OWE as a subjugated nation is the army.  I would be in favour of a coup d'état.   If the army doesn't get in there first, Clarke's thugs will soon be ready to disarm the regular loyal army, and have the few commanders who could save Britain assassinated or imprisoned.  Then we will finally be in the bag, with no line of escape.  That's the Bilderbergers' gameplan.  It's time the Army made a plan of its own, and stopped acting as the stooges of supranational power who intends the demise of our own country.

Ignore the politicians who are all part of the Bilderberger One World game, and get in there.  Once the ship has been cleared of all the rats,  the original British constitution can be reimplemented.  The loyalty of Britain's security services like MI5 and MI6 must be reclaimed, and its powers used to protect the state, no longer in sending our young men to be ground down in never-ending wars, until our country can be handed over fully to criminally-minded totalitarians, who are driven only by greed, and a lust for yet more power.

Ken Clarke is building loyalty with Britain's criminals.  He knows he will be needing them soon enough.  This is exactly what Hitler did in Germany in the 1930s with the SA.  The German army could have stopped him, but chose not to.  That is the lesson when governments start favouring criminals.  Catastrophic  results are inevitable.  Act, soldier, while you can, and stop them.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

The Real Reason Africa's Dictators Are Being Serially Dumped

President Gaddafi, next on the OWE hit list

Africa's going through a One World Empire political upgrade.   Dictators of doubtful loyalty are being shifted, to be replaced with democratic systems, which can be controlled through the media and the political parties, just like they are in the USA and Europe, where elections are now routinely rigged.  Africa is being upgraded from dictatorship to similar democracy-without-substance, the system used to control all western countries. 

Fifty new countries can provide troops and military back-up to the OWE.   In the internet age, dictatorship is no longer the efficient way to hold down territory.  The old way was 'Sure.  He's a sunovabitch, but he's our sunovabitch.'  The trouble is that most dictators try to play off different sponsors.  The OWE's had enough of playing this game and wants to move to a system of democratic illusion, which, with modern communication methods and media control in place, is easy enough to pull off.

Global Research explains the important military details.  There are big gains to be had by the OWE if they can pull off control of the continent by moving away from the age of the dictators.  Democracy's a more complicated method of control but it is a game that China and Russia can't play.  There 's a lot of oil in Somalia, just over the water from Yemen.  That's another factor of corse, along with the huge wealth of the continent, most of it yet untapped.

GR -

A recent article in Kenya’s Africa Review cited sources in the African Union (AU) disclosing that the 28-member North Atlantic Treaty Organization is preparing to sign a military partnership treaty with the 53-nation AU.

The author of the article, relaying comments from AU officials in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia where the organization has its headquarters, wrote that although “the stated aim is to counter global security threats and specifically threats against Africa, some observers read the pact as aiming to counter Chinese expansion in Africa.”
The feature further claimed that NATO is negotiating the opening of a liaison office at AU headquarters and that the North Atlantic Alliance’s legal department is working with its AU counterpart “to finalise the new pact, which will be signed soon.” [1]

The news story additionally divulged that Ramtane Lamamra, African Union Commissioner for Peace and Security, “confirmed that Nato is to sign a military cooperation agreement with the AU” with particular emphasis on consolidating the African Standby Force (ASF). The latter is intended to consist of brigades attached to the five Regional Economic Communities on the continent. (North, East, West, Central and Southern.) The West African Standby Force has been tasked the role of intervening in – which is to say invading and occupying – Ivory Coast since the announcement of presidential runoff election results in the country in December [2], and contributors to the East Africa Standby Brigade (EASBRIG), Uganda and Burundi, are engaged as combatants in the civil war in Somalia.

The AU’s Lamamra stated “Africa would like to learn from Nato on strategic airlift, advanced communications, rotation of important units among regions and to meet logistical challenges,” adding that “Nato was a good model on which to build the ASF.” [3]
NATO airlifted thousands of Ugandan troops into and out of the Somali capital of Mogadishu last March – 1,700 and 800, respectively – in support of the Ugandan-Burundian African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM). [4]
The Kenyan report also revealed that “Experts say Africa is becoming a strategic battleground between world powers and in particular the US, the European Union, China and Russia,” with the first two – collectively subsumed under NATO and its Partnership for Peace program (except, for the time being, Cyprus) – working in unison and the second two expanding oil and natural gas investments on the continent. In addition, Russia and China are competitors of the U.S. and its NATO allies in regards to arms sales to African nations. The piece added:
“According to knowledgeable sources, the new security arrangement could be a way to block the continent’s other main arms suppliers – China and Russia.
“If the pact gets endorsed by AU member states, it would be a big blow for China and Russia.”

“In its 2010 annual summit, Nato set itself a target to be a global ‘security guarantor’ by the year 2020.” [5]
On February 18 and 19 a delegation of high-level officials from the African Union led by Sivuyile Thandikhaya Bam, head of the Peace Support Operations Division of the AU, visited NATO Headquarters and the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in Belgium. 

As NATO reports:
“NATO and the African Union have developed an increasingly fruitful practical cooperation since 2005... NATO supported the AU Mission in Sudan [airlifting over 30,000 troops to and from the Darfur region] and is currently assisting the AU mission in Somalia in terms of air- and sea-lift, but also planning support.
“NATO is also providing... training opportunities and capacity building support to the African Union’s long term peacekeeping capabilities, in particular the African Standby Force.” [6]

The African Standby Force has been systematically modeled after the NATO Response Force, which was launched with large-scale war games in the African island nation of Cape Verde in 2006. The ASF is a joint project of NATO and U.S. Africa Command, which before achieving full operational capability on October 1, 2008 was conceived, developed and run by U.S. European Command, whose commander is simultaneously NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe.

Shropshire Social Services Raid Private House At Ruyton XI Towns. Why?

Anne and Hollie Greig are meeting Owen Paterson in the next few days, to challenge people in government, as regards the raping of children.   The list of perpetrators includes judges, law officers, head teachers, so-called ''care'' workers amongst others.

PICTURE - Hollie Greig, mother Anne and helper Robert Green, who is campaigning for a public enquiry into their case.

Why Are Shropshire Social Services Trying To Intimidate Holly Greig?

Holly Greig, a Down Syndrome girl,  was abused by a gang of paedophiles in Aberdeen.  There were 14 perpetrators, including her own social worker/carer and her own father.  She went to the Police with her mother to report what had been happening.  Subsequent to that, Anne, the mother, was dragged away and slung in a mental hospital in the year 2000.

Anne escaped from the institution, and was passed as fit by a medical examination.  Her solicitor asked for the documentation that was used to drag Anne from her home.  No warrant has ever been produced.

In 1997 Anne's brother died alone in a car fire not far from the family home.  Holly later said that her uncle had caught her father 'doing it'.  He told the father that he would report him, to which the father replied that he would have him killed.   This is apparently what happened.

The authorities claimed the evidence was not reliable enough to justify an investigation into the paedophile ring.  The Police didn't interview any one of the 14 perpetrators or the seven other victims that Holly had identified.  This was admitted to by the investigating officer, who was also a friend of Holly's carer who had been involved with the abuse.

Although no crime was investigated, Holly was sent a sum of GBP 13,000 by the Victim Compensation Scheme, with no crime officially committed.  The News Of The World ran this story without details of the paedophile ring, as the circumstances of a payment with no crime was exceptional.  Since then the NOTW has gone entirely silent after being told to ''button it''.

Scottish officialdom tried to blank the whole case.  There is a paedophile gang abusing Scottish children, and the whole of the Scottish hierarchy tried to cover up the vase.  One resignation resulted, once it was proven that the head legal officer of Scotland, Mrs Angelini,  member of Common Purpose and about to be a keynote speaker at a CP meeting, was lying about the case.

The journalist who exposed Mrs Angelini, Robert Green, talking in the clips below, was arrested.  He was sent the transcripts of his arrest interview by the Police.  He alleges that the transcript tapes were tampered with.  He was arrested again, and the interview tapes were tampered with again, he claims.

Holly and Anne then moved to live in Shropshire at Ruyton XI Towns.  Their home was ransacked on 3rd June, on the instructions of Shropshire Social Services, who claimed they were investigating a missing person, even though they knew she was away on a small holiday.  The Councillor who carried out the house invasion at Ruyton XI Towns has since resigned.  The villagers are supportive to Anne and Hollie, and they want to know more about what is going on, and why they are being harassed by Shropshire Social Services.  Surely the criminals are based in Scotland, so what's this to Shropshire?  The Chief Executive of Shropshire Council, Kim Ryley is the President of the Association Of Council Chief Executives in Britain, an organisation ironically known by the name of Solace.

One of the rapists was a senior officer in the Scottish Police.  A member of the judiciary was also involved in the rape gang.  The Chairman of the North East Scotland Committee On Child Protection was another of the rapists.  Another was the Head Teacher of Hollie's special school.  This does not look good for the ''índustry''.  Kim Ryley claims that local government is the most efficient part of all of government.  It doesn't appear very efficient at bringing justice to paedophile rape victims.

Hollie was infected with an STD at aged 10.  This was communicated by a doctor to the Head Teacher of Hollie's school, who it turned out, was one of the rapists, and a local GP, both of whom took no action.  That could have stopped twenty years of abuse for Hollie and the other children if it had been acted on correctly.  The report was ignored.

A psychiatrist report was made during the long slow exposure of this case.  The psychiatrist asked Hollie what had happened.  She described rape by her father, and by her brother.  She didn't talk about it, as her father used his belt on her.  She has nightmares and flashbacks about what happened.  Many abusers target mentally handicapped children, as they think they will not be able to report what is happening.  Hollie like many Down Syndrome kids is an excellent communicator, and has good and detailed recall.  The psychiatrist's report was withheld by the Police.

A local Police Officer in Shropshire has been supportive of Holly and Anne.  He lost his job.

The growing team of people helping Anne and Hollie took their complaints to the head of the Down Syndrome Association.  On their advice, the mother Anne decided to move away from Aberdeen and make a fresh start which is why they came with Hollie to live in sleepy Shropshire.  Shropshire's not proving quite so sleepy as they thought it would.

The Security Services are involved in spying on those who are trying to expose the Holly Greig story.  Emails are being tampered with.  Phone calls intercepted and people are being followed.  At least one witness has been murdered.  Someone very powerful obviously feels very threatened by the possibility that the information might get out into the public arena, where it bloody well ought to be by now, over ten years since the rapes were first reported to the Police.

It's time the media started reporting this case.  Yet the Scottish Government is still trying to hide the facts and prevent the public from knowing.  There are still many children being abused by these paedophile gangs.  The children are suffering terrible treatment.  The Social Services who are meant to be protecting them, are involved in perpetrating the paedophile acts, and are involved in intimidation of the victims to maintain their silence.  Witnesses like Anne's brother, are being rubbed out.

when did officialdom become so powerful they can rape kids and get away with it?

Listen right to the end of the last clip.  The last speaker says that paedophilia is the hallmark of the New World Order.  That's why paedophiles get away with it.  They are the government now.

Read the comments under this post.  It has useful web links that affect this case.
Email from Robert Green to The Tap yesterday -

The story of Hollie Greig is worldwide, but I would suspect many people in China, the USA and Pakistan know more about this horrifying and staggering story than the people of Scotland and Shropshire.

I am not a solicitor, but I am a broadcaster and journalist and act as pro bono lay legal representative to Hollie and Anne Greig.

Quite apart from all the astonishing magnitude of the background information and documentation that exists all over the web, the fact is that as far as Shropshire is concerned, the Information Commissioner has ruled that the council has broken the FOI law and as a result of his inquiry, he established that senior officers Tim Collard and Stephen Chandler had repeatedly lied over the appalling raid on the home of Hollie and Anne in Ruyton on the 3rd June last year, instigated by senior council officials.

Check out holliedemandsjustice or view Robert Green Wake Up Call or the South African film Robert Green Freedom Central.

You can be sure that local media outlets the Shropshire Star and BBC Radio Shropshire have been firmly told to keep the facts of this shocking case from the people of Shropshire.

REPLY - They should read The Tap, Robert.  Thanks for calling in.  I hope more people get to hear about what's really going on right under their noses.  As for the credibility of local government in Shropshire, it doesn't have any.  I have to say, after living in the County for over half a century, this is very shocking.  We don't pay the Council Chief Executive GBP 200,000 a year so our children can be raped by council staff, and he doesn't ensure that justice is done for the victims.

I'd like to ask him.  ''Kim Ryley, do you have anything to say about this?''

Here's a nice space for his reply -


Reply from local MPs office -

Owen is away from the office today but has seen your message and has asked me to drop you a quick line to let you know that he has been in touch with Mrs Greig for several years. He wrote to her just a few weeks ago asking for her to get in touch if there are any outstanding issues she would like to raise. She came to a surgery and we have written in the past to the Scottish First Minister, the responsible Minister, the police and the Chief Executive of Shropshire Council.

Owen will always respond to any direct requests for help from Mrs Greig. We have not, however, heard from her for some time.

Tapestry said...

The MP for Oswestry is Owen Paterson, Secretary Of State For Northern Ireland.

robert green said...

I would hope that Owen Paterson will put aside any political and/or personal allegiances in Shropshire to one side and remember his obligations to his constituents. There can hardly be ones more deserving of his support than Hollie and Anne Greig, given the abominable persecution they have suffered by a council run by his party.

It is particularly worrying that Mr Paterson is understood to have worked closely with Councillor Aggie Caesar-Homden, the elected representative most responsible for the attack on the ladies, as Cabinet member in charge of children and vulnerable adults.

Moreover, Mr Paterson has indicated that he has been trying to help the Greigs for years, well before the latest interference from Shropshire Council.

This is simply an exaggeration. It has been very difficult to persuade Mr Paterson to do anything at all of a constructive nature to assist the two ladies. I have certainly had that problem when appealing to him on their behalf.

However, let us allow Mr Paterson the opportunity now to put things right.

The council have been publicly shown to have broken the law by the Freedom of Information Commissioner and that two senior managers, Ian Collard and Stephen chandler have repeatedly lied, even when challenged, about their knowledge of the raid the Greigs` home and the subsequent vandalism committed by those present.

Please, Mr Paterson, you are there as a member of parliament to serve the interests of your constituents rather than the Conservative Party.

Finally, let me stress that the Hollie Greig Campaign is strictly humanitarian, not political and we have dedicated supporters from all political backgrounds and beliefs.

All we are asking is for elected representatives to do their duty and honour their commitments, irrespective of which party they belong to.

10:56 AM

Tapestry said...

what would you request Owen Paterson to do exactly?

11:09 AM

Robert Green said...

We would like Owen Paterson to formally press for a full, open and independent inquiry to be held into all aspects of the Hollie Greig case and those related to it,including the other serious crimes that are alleged to have taken place in Aberdeen.

No-one is expecting anything other than every obstruction from the Scottish establishment, as it is the head of the justice system, Elish Angiolini who blocked the first inquiry in 2000, when she headed the Crown Office in Aberdeen and then in 2009 in her current role.

However, we have successfully established, with documentary evidence, that she lied about her involvement and moreover she has almost certainly used public funds in order to issue private legal threats to the media when they were about to expose her. I understand that all the principal Scottish media organs received the threats, as did Google in a letter sent by her solicitors, Levy & McRae, dated 4th December 2009.

Her attempts to obstruct the truth about the funding of this law firm has been publicised in respected magazines, The Firm and The Drum.

We believe that the documentary exposure led to her suddenly announcing, on 1st October 2010, her impending resignation.

Nonetheless, there should be no good reason for Mr Paterson not to offer his support. Recently Mrs Angiolini`s integrity has come into question yet again over her conduct relating to the Lockerbie case.

In Shropshire, as is quite clear from the Commissioner`s official report, senior council officers have broken the law and repeatedly lied over the issue of the Greigs.

Additionally, Councillor Caesar -Homden has acted with not only a staggering lack of judgement but also with a lack of compassion and humanity that must render her totally unsuitable for her current role.

We would expect public support from Mr Paterson to remove the individuals responsible, including Mr Ryley, of course, from their posts, not just for the issue described, but in the best interests of the people of Shropshire, as it has become transparently clear that those individuals are unworthy of their public responsibilities.

Finally, we would think it reasonable for Mr Paterson to press the council to provide a full and unconditional apology to these two immensely courageous ladies, who are a great credit to the county that they chose to make their home after their flight from persecution.

5:55 PM

Tapestry said...

Robert, can you demonstrate that you speak for Anne and Hollie Greig, when making these demands?  Owen Paterson has said that it is a long time since he heard from Anne and Hollie Greig.  He has stated that he is willing to keep working on their case.  If they are making these demands, it would be very different in effect, from someone else doing so on their behalf, whatever the merits of the case you make.

Anonymous Robert Green said...

Yes, I have written authority to speak for Anne and Hollie, which Mr Paterson has had in his possession for some time.

In fact, quite apart from a number of publicly accessible televised interviews of me with Hollie and Anne, the three of us have already had a brief meeting with Mr Paterson around the end of April last year at Oswestry.

I did speak to his assistant at Westminster a few weeks ago, but got the distinct impression that Mr Paterson regarded the case as one he would much rather avoid, which brings me back to my earlier comments about his apparent priority for political and personal associations
8:18 AM

Blogger Tapestry said...

I don't think you can assume anything until you have spoken directly to Owen Paterson in person. Once you've done that, then you would have the knowledge as to whether he will write to propose a public enquiry or not.

Mr Paterson may have the information that you are acting as the spokesman for Hollie and Anne, but how many others can be sure of the details of your association, unless you make the fact that you are crystal clear, which you have now done.

I would agree with you that there are enough uncomfortable facts surrounding this case that a public enquiry should be held. Government is in danger of falling into disrepute, if such events can take place within public administration and the rot is not thoroughly rooted out.
9:13 AM

ROBERT GREEN - Every single MP and MSP has been formally approached with the details of Hollie`s case and Deputy Leader Nick Clegg was confronted personally about the matter in Kent. A Scottish elector put a question to Alex Salmond on BBC`s Question Time a year ago,but this was edited out. David Dimbleby refused to comment subsequently. I can assure you that the Hollie Greig Case is known about at the highest level. Who are they protecting and why? Many constituents have directly challenged their MPs, but just four have had the courage to do anything at all, John Hemming, Michael Moore and Mark Simmonds. It is to their credit as their constituencies have no connection with either Aberdeen or Shropshire. The fourth is my own MP, David Mowat. However, you are right about a further direct meeting with Owen Paterson, which we hope to arrange soon.

TAP - Owen says he hasn't heard from the Greigs for a while.  He is known as a diligent local MP who doesn't back off from difficult situations once he takes on a cause.  He has already written on your behalf to many players in this drama, and even wrote to you and you didn't reply.  I would not see him as one of the rank closers.  That is not to say that I disagree with the objectives of your campaign.

TAP - Furthermore, this story was put up on a much busier website than The Tap, Political Pundits ( version) where it might have received tens of thousands of visitors. Within hours many complaints were received saying that you are accusing nearly everyone in politics of being paedophile (exaggeration, but that's the point made), and the story was taken down.

It's a shame that the good work you do in trying to help the victims is undermined by broadening your attacks too far and wide. It would be better to fight one battle at a time, and see if there is any possibility of getting justice for Hollie and Anne, first, before making more general accusations. We nearly got some good exposure for this.

I'm beginning to wonder if this another case of managed dissent.  By claiming to be telling the story, but going too far, all it does is discredit the real story.  Was Anne's brother really murdered?  Are all politicians either paedophiles, or part of a general conspiracy to hide their acts from public knowledge?  Robert's behaving exactly as a managed dissent operative should be behaving.  That way Anne and Hollie's real story gets discredited before it is even given a chance.  If I was Anne, I'd try to work with  a bona fide politician like Owen Paterson to advance her case if she wants to do so, and drop Robert Green from hereon.  Green could well be working for the other side, becoming a David Icke type of figure, discrediting the case he appears to be backing by exaggerating it, and discrediting all the victims of state-employed paedophiles, in the process.