Translate

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

The 11 Recommendations Of The 'Frankfurt' School

From a comment -

Common Purpose is basically sick, sociopathic Marxist control. 


Once you get to the list of 11 'recommendations' the Frankfurt school suggested, ask yourself how many are now in force today: 

1. The creation of racism offences. 
2. Continual change to create confusion 
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children 
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority 
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity. 
6. The promotion of excessive drinking 
7. Emptying of churches 
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime 
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits 
10. Control and dumbing down of media 
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family ... the answer, of course, is all of them. on What Is Common Purpose?

Extract -

The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to corrupt
By Timothy Matthews
Issue: March 2009
Email This Article  Printer Friendly Page   
Western civilization at the present day is passing through a crisis which is essentially different from anything that has been previously experienced. Other societies in the past have changed their social institutions or their religious beliefs under the influence of external forces or the slow development of internal growth. But none, like our own, has ever consciously faced the prospect of a fundamental alteration of the beliefs and institutions on which the whole fabric of social life rests ... Civilization is being uprooted from its foundations in nature and tradition and is being reconstituted in a new organisation which is as artificial and mechanical as a modern factory.

Christopher Dawson. Enquiries into Religion and Culture, p. 259.


Most of Satan’s work in the world he takes care to keep hidden. But two small shafts of light have been thrown onto his work for me just recently. The first, a short article in the Association of Catholic Women’s ACW Review; the second, a remark (which at first surprised me) from a priest in Russia who claimed that we now, in the West, live in a Communist society. These shafts of light help, especially, to explain the onslaught of officialdom which in many countries worldwide has so successfully been removing the rights of parents to be the primary educators and protectors of their children.

The ACW Review examined the corrosive work of the ‘Frankfurt School’ - a group of German-American scholars who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber. Not that their idea of a ‘cultural revolution’ was particularly new. ‘Until now’, wrote Joseph, Comte de Maistre (1753-1821) who for fifteen years was a Freemason, ‘nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion: But here an important question arises; can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles which make it what it is.'

What was the Frankfurt School? Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that workers’ revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. But it did not do so. Towards the end of 1922 the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider what were the reasons. On Lenin’s initiative a meeting was organised at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

The aim of the meeting was to clarify the concept of, and give concrete effect to, a Marxist cultural revolution. Amongst those present were Georg Lukacs (a Hungarian aristocrat, son of a banker, who had become a Communist during World War I ; a good Marxist theoretician he developed the idea of ‘Revolution and Eros’ - sexual instinct used as an instrument of destruction) and Willi Munzenberg (whose proposed solution was to ‘organise the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilisation stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat’) ‘It was’, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007) the conservative author and co-founder of the ‘National Review’, a meeting ‘perhaps more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik Revolution itself.'

Lenin died in 1924. By this time, however, Stalin was beginning to look on Munzenberg, Lukacs and like-thinkers as ‘revisionists’. In June 1940, Münzenberg fled to the south of France where, on Stalin’s orders, a NKVD assassination squad caught up with him and hanged him from a tree.

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the 5th Comintern Congress, Lukacs moved to Germany, where he chaired the first meeting of a group of Communist-oriented sociologists, a gathering that was to lead to the foundation of the Frankfurt School.

This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to attend school in Germany. He attended the universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was ‘the practical problems of implementing socialism.'

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research. When Hitler came to power, the Institut was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas - possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’
Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'

The School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Recent Project Camelot interview with Steve Webb:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iFdckbRzbc

It's a little bit difficult IMO to absorb all the information that Steve is trying to convey as clearly he has a lot to say. Kerry Cassidy does highlight this fact herself in that Steve may be too fast for the audience.

However, I'd recommend reading the YouTube video synopsis/description first to set the foundations of what Steve is trying to say.

Personally, I found it interesting what Steve mentioned about the forthcoming Illuminati rituals which will take place at Kimball Castle on June 21st.

Anonymous said...

Hi Tap, This article by Timothy, puts the flesh on the bones of "Topsy Turvey".
I knew the situation we are in, could not have happened by chance.
Even using the Law of averages, we should have half a chance, yet I can see if we don't change course, we are due for the Rocks and have no chance at all.
Which Bankers paid for this cabal to carry out their wishes.
Whatever happened to the Law of Treason, what are our Politicians doing to correct the matter.
How many of our MP's have Dual Nationalities and Passports.
More to the point, how many MP's are Freemasons.

Anonymous said...

Yuri Bezmenov predicted this.
His interviews and lectures are available on You Tube.

Anonymous said...

"The ACW Review examined the corrosive work of the ‘Frankfurt School’ - a group of German-American scholars who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber. Not that their idea of a ‘cultural revolution’ was particularly new."

Whoa, whoa, whoa...not so fast. To the unwashed (i.e., un-Jew-wise) that would appear that ethnic Germans (who immigrated to the US) were responsible for this subversive idealogy. The Frankfurt School snakes were all JEWISH. They were NOT ethnic Germans. PERIOD. These nationwrecking, commie subversives hauled ass out of Germany when the National Socialists came to power and (unfortunately) landed in the USA and are the root cause of our problems we are facing up to this day.

Anonymous said...

An interesting idea – though I think Giddens was far more of an influence on Blair and Brown and he was certainly not Marxist.

What you seem to be suggesting is a society where there is punitive welfare state, racism is implicitly condoned, church attendance is high and social liberalism is an anathema? Oddly enough even in the West, such a society exists: Bible Belt America. In the Bible Belt Protestant Christianity still rules – with church attendance well above the 50% mark in many Bible Belt states (regular Anglican church attendance in the UK as a whole is around 1.67%!).

Yet strangely enough it is the same area of America that has the highest rates of divorce, teen pregnancy and lone-parent families (indeed ‘born again’ Christians are more likely to have engaged in serial marriage than non-believers!). In addition many of the Bible Belt states lead the Western world in teen pregnancy, divorce and lone parent family rates – despite the USA having a punitive welfare system - far harsher than the UK welfare state. Added to these ‘social problems’ Bible Belt states are also world leaders (in terms of Western nations) when it comes to violent crime, murder, social inequality, incarceration of its citizens (per capita higher than Iran or China!) health (obesity, addiction to prescription medications, heart disease etc.) – the list of woes goes on.

Social liberalism is something derided in these states. Oddly enough, in the USA as a whole, the state with the lowest rates divorce, teen pregnancy and lone parent families is Massachusetts – one of the few states to allow gay marriage... Just as we see many Northern European countries, where secular, liberal democracy is at its strongest, also scoring far better than the Bible Belt when it comes to families staying together – and these nations have very low rates of offending.

In truth of course, conservative religious societies tend to result in higher rates of family breakdown because believers are very good at saying one thing and doing something else (indeed it is often a case, the religious a society (regardless of religion) the more corrupt that society.

So really, you own little thesis doesn’t appear to hold much water – it is the usual simplistic blame, scare- and hate-mongering politics from those who want to see others as the locus of social problems – often in an attempt to promote self-interest and play on people’s fears and ignorance. I can understand why some senior Tories have described party activists as ‘swivel-eyed loons’ – that appellation seems apt given the above post.