The problem is The Green Party is 100% behind the EU, sold out on every front, including the paedophile agenda.
In total there is no one I can vote for.
The Green surge from 5% to 8% in Ashcroft's Polling is more dramatic than the UKIP surge, which is tailing this last fortnight, now the excitement of Clacton is passing.
UKIP is trying to do a quick rebrand suggesting it is a party of independents. It is no such thing. http://the-tap.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/clever-move-by-ukip-to-try-to-stop.html
The Conservatives have the most to lose from fracking, with to date 120 seats having an active anti-fracking campaign in progress, versus fifteen for Labour. The Party won't be able to survive with both UKIP and The Greens pulling chunks out of Conservative support. Something will have to give.
Anon
the Green Party are every bit as corrupted as the faux rest, for instance they deny and ignore the existence of geoengineering ( chemtrails ) along with pushing dictatorial transnational corporate UN Agenda21.
the intention of fracking in the UK appears to be national sabotage of water, ecosystems and farming via a chemical attack.
the intention of fracking in the UK appears to be national sabotage of water, ecosystems and farming via a chemical attack.
The explosion of hydraulic fracturing in the last several years, according to a new report, is creating a previously 'unimaginable' situation in which hundreds of billions of gallons of the nation's fresh water supply are being annually transformed into unusable - sometimes radioactive - cancer-causing wastewater.
ReplyDeleteAccording to the report, Fracking by the Numbers, produced by Environment America, the scale and severity of fracking’s myriad impacts betray all claims that natural gas is a "cleaner" or somehow less damaging alternative to other fossil fuels.
The report explores various ways in which gas fracking negatively impacts both human health and the environment, including the contamination of drinking water, overuse of scarce water sources, the effect of air pollution on public health, its connection to global warming, and the overall cost imposed on communities where fracking operations are located.
“The bottom line is this: The numbers on fracking add up to an environmental nightmare,” said John Rumpler, the report's lead author and senior attorney for Environment America. “For our environment and for public health, we need to put a stop to fracking.”
In fact, the report concludes that in state's where the practice is now occurring, immediate moratoriums should be enacted and in states where the practice has yet to be approved, bans should be legislated to prevent this kind of drilling from ever occurring.
Though the report acknowledges its too early to know the full the extent of the damage caused by the controversial drilling practice, it found that even a look at the "limited data" available - taken mostly from industry reports and government figures between 2005 and 2012 - paints "an increasingly clear picture of the damage that fracking has done to our environment and health."
So what are the numbers?
The report measured key indicators of fracking threats across the country, and found:
• 280 billion gallons of toxic wastewater generated in 2012,
• 450,000 tons of air pollution produced in one year,
• 250 billion gallons of fresh water used since 2005,
• 360,000 acres of land degraded since 2005,
• 100 million metric tons of global warming pollution since 2005.
“The numbers don't lie," said Rumbpler. "Fracking has taken a dirty and destructive toll on our environment. If this dirty drilling continues unchecked, these numbers will only get worse."
The Environment America report comes on the heels of a study released by researchers at Duke University earlier this week that found a "surprising magnitude of radioactivity" in the local water near a fracking operation in Pennsylvania.
And Climate Progress adds:
The report also pointed out the weaknesses of current wastewater disposal practices - wastewater is often stored in deep wells, but over time these wells can fail, leading to the potential for ground and surface water contamination. In New Mexico alone, chemicals from oil and gas pits have contaminated water sources at least 421 times, according to the report.
Read more: http://yourdemocracy.net.au/drupal/node/27248
like many people i hated the racism of the 3 main political parties, so joined the BNP.
ReplyDeleteBut when the BNP decided to accept jewish money from Mossad up to 200 people left the party.
UKIP sounded non racist so many of us joined that but as info becomes available we found that
UKIP is a freind of israel.
What we want is a political party that is a freind of Britian
so we all left UKIP
Indeed a genuine friend of Britain party with no foreign influence would prove most popular.
ReplyDeleteAs has been stated the Green Party are every bit as corrupted as the faux rest, for instance they deny and ignore the existence of geoengineering ( chemtrails ) along with pushing dictatorial transnational corporate UN Agenda21.
the intention of fracking in the UK appears to be national sabotage of water & ecosystems / farming via a chemical attack.