Pages

Saturday, June 21, 2014

WOTW is getting ready to rattle cages on the 26th June



WOTW will continue (Windows on the world). 

I have been covering cutting edge news on my website landofthefree.co.uk and in real media for years. We have made ground breaking steps in exposing the private police, criminal courts and corporate looters. I have been threatened with court action many times by criminal bailiff companies and had victories in court. Having won court cases against the criminal council in the borough I live in and exposed corruption where ever I found it this will continue. 

Yes we have rattled cages but there are many more cages now to rattle.The fact that we get these paid for goons making attacks which have no relation to the work we do is a massive compliment. There are no journalists left in mainstream media. 

When I trained in journalism I was taught to find the story , research it and then back it up with facts and witness statements which were verifiable. Anyone watching my shows will find this to be the case. We have great information and most importantly remedies which is why we get attacked. There must be some out there worried about the research and info which is good news. 

We have dynamite stuff in the new series and nothing can corrupt real information. We will be featuring people who are standing up against the global tyranny of Agenda 21 and the co opting of every decent community by facilitators who use the same tactics as those who attack us on the internet. Thankd for the support from all those we trust and Keep watching those , watching us, watching WOTW !



Mark Windows - Windows On The World.

16 comments:

  1. Poor monkey.

    VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCRspwfKHmI

    ReplyDelete
  2. When I trained in journalism I was taught to find the story , research it and then back it up with facts and witness statements which were verifiable. Anyone watching my shows will find this to be the case

    How is the stuff about Archons & the planet Saturn verifiable & factual?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:15 pm

    Nooka has a point there.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The evidence about the rings of Saturn is clear and obvious from all sources, Cassini, Voyager1 and 2 and Hubble. The Archons are clearly less willing to be seen and revealed, and evidence is not so easy to acquire. That said there are sources and many aspects of evidence, but if you don't read books like The Perception Deception, you won't have any idea what the evidence is.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Which evidence about the rings of Saturn?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Perception Deception is exactly that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You do realise that your reply includes logical fallacies?

    Your 'evidence' does not constitute proof & is therefore conjecture. Appealing to David Icke as 'authority' is not a valid argument.

    Mark Windows appeals to himself as authority by his statement about 'being trained in journalism'. This is very poor.

    If you claim verifiable evidence & facts I would like to know what they are please.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fred noticed that cats were disappearing from his neighbourhood.

    Fred was aware that there was a big ball in the sky.

    Fred had a feeling that the mayor worshipped the ball.

    He discovered a photograph of some metal tubes around the ball.

    Some people said that goblins lived in the tubes.

    Therefore Fred surmised that it was the big black ball that was stealing the cats. He said it was a fact & the photographs of the tubes was his evidence. The people talking of goblins were his witnesses.


    What's wrong with this picture?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Fred the BS Cleaner3:55 pm

    Nooka the Nook.
    It's good to see another intelligent life-form on here that doesn't accept the BS being promoted on the Tap Blog and isn't afraid to question and raise well-founded arguments.

    Note: TIN HATS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

    ReplyDelete
  10. 3:55: Stories are fine. They can be diverting , amusing & entertaining.

    But.

    When people claim idle speculation & whimsical fancy as evidence, verification & facts I do tend to get a touch irritated.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I speak as I find. If you prefer that I quote Icke's primary source on Saturn ring-making entities, go to Norman Bergrun 'The Ringmakers Of Saturn'. Business skills and communication skills are not the same thing. Icke is a great communicator. His business strategy had flaws, possibly in overestimating his own ability to handle an open house approach, and no doubt underestimating the determination and capability of enemies to sink the enterprise. That doesn't mean he shouldn't have tried. Or that he won't succeed in the end. Admire his get-up-and-go.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You can quote someone's idea as much as you like. Doesn't make it a fact. It isn't proof. It is conjecture.

    You are still appealing to Icke & now Bergrun as authorities. This is a logical fallacy.

    Where is the evidence?

    There is burden of proof going on here which is another logical fallacy here & it is up to you to accept it not me to believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Get up & go is great when it's not your money that's getting up & going.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous5:05 pm

    Nooka the Nook said .. 3.55"Stories are fine. They can be diverting, amusing & entertaining.. But.. When people claim idle speculation & whimsical fancy as evidence, verification & facts I do tend to get a touch irritated."


    I'm with you. Intellectual rigour is refreshing!

    However, there is a piece in the Veritropian blog you link to called "Alien/Dragon-Human Hybridisation and the X Men" .. which is clearly a story, right? Strange then (at least to me) that it starts off making statements about "The True Nature Of Man"!

    Your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Strange indeed. There's a lot of it about.

    A link to a blog is not an endorsement.

    It isn't my blog, if that's what you're wondering.

    I find these beliefs fascinating & slightly worrying.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous2:18 am

    The evidence is in Bergrun.Thare is no logical fallacy in quoting Icke and Bergrun.

    ReplyDelete